There are some things missing from the federal investigation into “Bridgegate”:
The cellphone in New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s pocket during the 2013 George Washington lane closures.
Text messages the governor sent and received during the ensuing legislative investigation.
And now, according to new court filings, a personal email account he used as the scandal — an investigation into lane closures at the George Washington Bridge that caused traffic gridlock — enveloped his administration.
None of this evidence was provided to federal criminal investigators probing the Bridgegate scandal, according to court documents.
For 2 1/2 years, Christie has insisted that both his personal and government email accounts were searched by investigators, and there was nothing to indicate he knew anything about the lane closures scheme. He also claimed he never did government work on his personal email account.
But new court documents indicate that a personal email account he shared with his wife, Mary Pat, was never searched — and he used that account to send at least one Bridgegate-related government email to David Samson, the chairman of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which oversees the bridge. That email forwarded an article with the comment “per our earlier conversation” that discussed a phone conversation Christie had with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo concerning the lane closure investigation.
Christie’s own taxpayer-funded attorneys from the Gibson Dunn law firm, which has so far billed more than $10 million to the state, were in charge of responding to federal and legislative subpoenas seeking such emails. The lawyers simply ignored this account, even though Christie regularly used personal email accounts, including the one shared with his wife, for government business, sources say. He even used this account to email journalists concerning state business.
Two former Christie appointees indicted in the scheme are alleging that Gibson Dunn destroyed and withheld evidence. Defending itself, Gibson Dunn for the first time this week acknowledged that it never searched an email account where the sender was “Chris and Mary Pat Christie,” until one of the defendants discovered the email to Samson earlier this month.
According to the legal papers that email was sent from a joint marital account of the governor and his wife, “which we understood was not used by the governor for official business and contained nothing responsive.” Christie’s lawyers say they’ve now searched that account and found no emails “related to and contemporaneous with the lane realignment.”
The new admission runs contrary to what Christie said last year while campaigning in New Hampshire: “I turned over my email, both professional and personal, to all of the investigators who asked for them. And said, ‘Look at whatever you want to look at.'”
This is all remarkably similar to the scandal that is dogging Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign — including news this week that she sent dozens of emails from a private server about her work as secretary of state that she failed to turn over to government lawyers. As a presidential candidate, Christie repeatedly slammed Clinton for this, saying he would “prosecute” her and insisting that he never did government work on his private email account. “I had a private email account, but I didn’t do my business on a private email account. She did everything on that account and then when she knows people are concerned about it, she gets the server cleaned,” Christie said last year.
Now presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is raising money off the Clinton email issue, asking for donations to “indict” her. Christie is a top adviser to the Trump campaign and is thought to be interested in a position in Trump’s administration. On Wednesday, Trump even sent a fundraising email from Christie’s political site, ChrisChristie.com, that specifically criticized Clinton for her private email server.
The new revelations add to a growing list of questions about a possible Bridgegate coverup. Among the missing evidence is Christie’s cellphone, which the governor has said he turned over to investigators in 2014 after the scandal broke open with the “time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee” smoking gun email. He said he never saw the cellphone again, but federal investigators from the U.S. Attorney’s Office say they don’t have it — and now, Christie’s own attorneys also refute his assertion.
Gibson Dunn told the court this week that the cellphone was reviewed to see if there was any evidence that needed to be provided in response to the U.S. attorney’s subpoena and then returned to the governor.
Also missing? Text messages that Christie sent to Regina Egea, his incoming chief of staff, who was attending a New Jersey legislative hearing in December 2013. That hearing was investigating what was still a mysterious lane closing and traffic jam. That day, top officials at the Port Authority refuted the claim made by Christie’s appointee at the agency that the lane closures were caused by a traffic study. Christie’s lawyers maintain in their brief that the texts were not relevant to the lane closures, even though Egea swore under oath she was texting the governor concerning the lane closure investigation.
State taxpayers have spent more than $13 million on Christie’s legal team and a digital forensics firm that scoured government electronic servers in the wake of the scandal, as of last August. WNYC’s requests to obtain copies of the legal bills since August were first delayed by Gibson Dunn not having invoiced the state, and then by state officials who say they need more time to redact information in them. Lawyers were required to then turn over necessary digital evidence to federal prosecutors, but it now looks like the Bridgegate trial — scheduled for September — will center on how forthcoming the governor and his attorneys really were.
Asked about the whereabouts of his cellphone at a news conference Wednesday afternoon, Christie turned around and walked away.