The school district of Freehold Borough, N.J., has a 32 percent poverty rate. It is fully surrounded by another school district, Freehold Township, which has a 5 percent poverty rate.
Freehold Borough is what a new report calls an “island district” — and it’s not alone. The report, from a nonprofit called EdBuild, maps 180 of these islands around the country: Districts that, by historical accident or for political reasons, lie completely inside other systems with a disparate poverty rate and often different funding levels.
And that can correlate with very different outcomes for students — something educators in Freehold Borough have long struggled with.
“Surrounding communities are able to provide a better education than we are,” says Rocco Tomazic, superintendent of the K-8 district. “It’s not supposed to be that way per the state constitution.”
As we noted in our School Money project, around half of school funding in the U.S., on average, comes from local property taxes. That means districts with high poverty often struggle with limited resources, a one-two punch.
“We have a mismatch between the way we’re funding schools and what we’re expecting schools to deliver,” says Rebecca Sibilia, the founder and CEO of EdBuild, which focuses on school finance.
Though they are rare, Sibilia argues that these island districts serve as vivid examples of a larger pattern that holds true in many places throughout the country: The resources available to your local public school may depend on your zip code, or sometimes even your specific address at birth.
In the late 19th century, New Jersey passed a series of laws to allow town centers to incorporate as “boroughs.” These are separate from surrounding townships, with separate governments, separate tax bases and separate school districts.
Drawing those lines would prove fateful in Freehold. Back then, Tomazic says, townships tended to be agricultural and boroughs were more prosperous. Today, he adds, his small urban district has many county buildings, which don’t pay taxes, and more existing density compared with the surrounding township, which makes it harder to build more housing to generate property taxes.
“We have surrounding communities that spend $22,000 per student and we’re spending $11,600,” Tomazic says.
Freehold Borough has seen a recent surge of students due to immigration, even as state aid has been held flat for the past three years. It must pay rent to its more affluent neighbors and bus children out of the district, and average class sizes are still above state standards.
“We have enough room by state standards for 1,148 students,” Superintendent Tomazic says. “We ended the school year with 1,720 in-district.”
Across the country, the Piedmont Unified district in California is completely surrounded by the much larger Oakland Unified schools — but in this “island district” the spending disparity goes the other way.
Back in the 1920s, Piedmont was was nicknamed the City of Millionaires. It elected to keep its city status even as Oakland annexed the towns around it.
The school district today has just a 2.2 percent poverty rate; Oakland’s is 24 percent. With a much less needy population, the EdBuild report says, Piedmont has $15,385 per student to spend, compared with $10,329 in Oakland.