Black students, boys, and students with disabilities are disproportionately disciplined in K-12 schools across the country. That’s according to a new report, out Wednesday, from the non-partisan federal watchdog, the Government Accountability Office.
Those disparities were consistent, “regardless of the type of disciplinary action, regardless of the level of school poverty, and regardless of the type of public school attended,” says Jacqueline Nowicki, who led the team of researchers at the GAO.
Nowicki and her team interviewed administrators, visited schools across the country, and used 2013-2014 data from the Civil Rights Data Collection, which includes disciplinary actions in more than 95,000 schools across the country. Those numbers include suspensions, expulsions and referrals to law enforcement.
The numbers are stark: Black students represent 15.5 percent of all public school students, but make up about 39 percent of students suspended from school, according to the report. And it starts early: in preschool.
Though Nowicki says her team did not specifically explore the role of unconscious bias in these disparities, “research shows it’s clearly a factor,” she says. Today’s report builds on previous research about bias and the ways in which students of color receive harsher punishments than their peers.
The GAO report also adds a new layer: Researchers found that these disparities cannot be explained by poverty levels — they existed regardless of the poverty level of schools studied.
“The idea that discipline disparities transcend poverty is something that is pretty important and has not been understood in that way before,” Nowicki says.
In a statement, Congressman Bobby Scott, a Democrat from Virginia, said he believes the report “dispels claims that racially disproportionate rates of discipline are based solely on income. The analysis shows that students of color suffer harsher discipline for lesser offenses than their white peers and that racial bias is a driver of discipline disparities.”
The GAO report arrives in the middle of a fiery debate about discipline in schools. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos met Wednesday with educators as she considers whether she will pull back Obama-era guidance to school districts. In that guidance the administration made clear to schools: These big disparities violate civil rights law and will not be tolerated.
Back in 2014, in what’s known as a “Dear Colleague” letter, the administration argued that districts should be held accountable under federal civil rights laws — not only if their discipline policies reveal discriminatory intent but also if they “have an unjustified effect of discriminating against students on the basis of race.”
In short, intent matters but so do results.
The Obama administration’s conservative critics blasted the letter, arguing it would strike fear into the hearts of district administrators, make it harder for teachers to manage their classrooms and make schools less safe.
“We are on a very dangerous road,” warned Max Eden, a senior fellow at the conservative-leaning Manhattan Institute, in testimony before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights in December, 2017. “Maybe [teachers] know more about how to manage their classrooms than the bureaucrats and activists who would blame them for society’s problems and accuse them, teachers, of mass racial discrimination.”
But do teachers feel less safe when their schools invest in more student counseling and alternative discipline strategies instead of suspension and expulsion? No, according to the GAO’s Nowicki: “We did not hear anything about teachers feeling less safe when they were using practices aimed at correcting inappropriate behavior in a non-exclusionary way.”
The Education Department has not issued a response to the report.