Should Feds Hike Fees On Coal Firms? Public Weighs In

August 19, 2015
Photo: Spring Creek coal mine in Montana (AP Photo)
In this April 2013 photo, a truck carrying 250 tons of coal hauls the fuel to the surface of the Cloud Peak Energy's Spring Creek mine near Decker, Mont. The mine is located on public land. 

Bureau of Land Management officials got an earful Tuesday in Denver about mining coal on federal lands. That's because officials are trying to decide how companies lease and pay royalties for that coal, with input from the public. 

A 2013 Inspector General’s report said taxpayers should be getting more money for leases. It also said the bidding process companies follow isn’t as competitive as it should be, noted Jennifer Rokala with the conservation group Center for Western Priorities.

Current federal royalty rates are eight percent for coal developed underground and 12.5 percent for coal developed above ground. Despite those official rates, Rokala estimates that companies actually end up paying around 4.9 percent.

Photo: Coal listening session Denver Aug. 18 (Staff)“This is because of royalty rate reductions handed out by the BLM in addition to loopholes for companies to pay a royalty on below-market rates for the coal they’re selling,” said Rokala.

Rokala says the formula to calculate the royalty rate needs to be changed. The review of rates comes at a time that coal production in Colorado is at a 20-year low.

Bonnie Petersen represents the Associated Governments for Northwest Colorado, home to some of the state’s mines. She says now is not the time for change.

“Raising royalty rates at this time without regard for the transition underway in the ever-decreasing number of jobs in this industry will further cripple a cornerstone industry in the United States,” said Petersen. 

The BLM is accepting public comment until Sept. 17.

You Made It...

...through this story! And by donating right now you can make even more stories like this one possible.

MAKE YOUR GIFT TODAY