Scientists have evidence that a mountain 3 miles tall, in the middle of a crater on Mars, may be made largely from dust and sand.
To get the data for that surprising conclusion, the researchers MacGyvered a navigation instrument on the NASA rover Curiosity, and turned it into a scientific instrument.
“It kind of frustrated me that we didn’t have a surface gravimeter on Mars,” says Lewis, a member of the Curiosity science team, and an assistant professor in earth and planetary sciences at Johns Hopkins University.
You can learn a lot about the geology of a planet by measuring subtle changes in its gravity. High-density rocks give a stronger gravity-signal than low-density rocks.
But to make measurements of gravity, you usually need to have an instrument called a gravimeter.
One day, Lewis started thinking about something that popped up regularly on the rover’s daily activity schedule.
“Turns out, every day we don’t drive with the rover, there’s this little rover activity called the SAPP-RIMU data activity,” Lewis says.
SAPP stands for “surface attitude position and pointing.” The SAPP-RIMU data activity is something engineers use to determine the rover’s precise orientation on the planet’s surface.
Inside the RIMU are three devices to measure acceleration — similar to the accelerometers inside a smart phone that measure the phone’s movements.
Kevin Lewis had a kind of epiphany.
“We don’t have a gravimeter on the surface of Mars, but we do have accelerometers,” he says, “and gravity is just an acceleration.”
You may not think of gravity that way, but you can, and scientists do.
He knew just what he wanted to do with it: Try to figure out how a 15,000-foot-tall mountain could form in the middle of Gale crater, the crater Curiosity landed in.
It’s a question many scientists have puzzled over.
“There have been basically two different schools of thought,” says Mackenzie Day, an assistant professor in the department of earth, planetary and space sciences at UCLA.
“Craters are fundamentally big holes in the ground,” Day says. “So they’re a really good place to accumulate things: to accumulate sediment; accumulate dust and sand.”
Among the questions scientists have been puzzling over, Day says, is this: Was Gale crater once filled to the rim with sediment, and then most of that material eroded away, leaving behind what is now called Mount Sharp?
“Or,” Day says, “is Mount Sharp something that developed in the middle of the crater — as a sort of stacking of material in the crater center — from winds coming down the sides of the crater rim?”
Could blowing sand and dust below really build a 3-mile-tall mountain?
Possibly, although Kevin Lewis admits it runs against our expectations.
“We don’t usually see mountains growing up as a haystack on the Earth,” Lewis says.
If the haystack model is right, the rocks at the base of Mount Sharp wouldn’t be very dense.
“What we found in this study is the rocks are surprisingly low density,” Lewis says.
So the haystack theory may be right, as he and his colleagues report in the journal Science.
Lewis says he plans to keep collecting data from his MacGyvered instrument to see if the initial results hold up.